Border, Kim C.

• Border, Kim C. (2017) Social Welfare Functions for Economic Environments with and without the Pareto Principle
• Border, Kim C. and Jordan, J. S. (2017) Straightforward Elections, Unanimity, and Phantom Voters
• Border, Kim C. (2017) Noncooperative Games, Abstract Economies, and Walrasian Equilibria
• Border, Kim C. (2017) An Impossibility Theorem for Spatial Models
• Border, Kim C. (2017) On Equilibria of Excess Demand Correspondences
• Border, Kim C. (2017) The Core of a Coalitional Production Economy Without Ordered Preferences
• Border, Kim C. (2017) More on Harsanyi’s Utilitarian Cardinal Welfare Theorem
• Border, Kim C. and Sobel, Joel (2017) A Theory of Auditing and Plunder
• Border, Kim C. and Segal, Uzi (2017) Dutch Book Arguments and Subjective Probability
• Border, Kim C. and Segal, Uzi (2017) Dynamic Consistency Implies Approximately Expected Utility Preferences
• Aliprantis, Charalambos D.; Border, Kim C.; et el. (2017) Economies With Many Commodities
• Border, Kim C. and Segal, Uzi (2017) Preferences Over Solution to the Bargaining Problem
• Border, Kim C.; Ghirardato, Paolo; et el. (2017) Objective Subjective Probabilities
• Border, Kim C. (2017) Reduced Form Auctions Revisited
• Border, Kim C.; Ghirardato, Paolo; et el. (2008) Unanimous subjective probabilities; Economic Theory; Vol. 34; No. 2; 383-387; 10.1007/s00199-006-0174-7
• Border, Kim C. (2007) Reduced form auctions revisited; Economic Theory; Vol. 31; No. 1; 167-181; 10.1007/s00199-006-0080-z
• Aliprantis, Charalambos D. and Border, Kim C. (2006) Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide; ISBN 978-3-540-29586-0; 10.1007/3-540-29587-9
• Aliprantis, Charalambos D. and Border, Kim C. (1999) Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide; ISBN 978-3-540-65854-2; 10.1007/978-3-662-03961-8
• Aliprantis, Charalambos D.; Border, Kim C.; et el. (1997) Economies with Many Commodities; Journal of Economic Theory; Vol. 74; No. 1; 62-105; 10.1006/jeth.1996.2240
• Aliprantis, Charalambos D.; Border, Kim C.; et el. (1997) Economies with Many Commodities; Journal of Economic Theory; Vol. 74; No. 1; 62-105; 10.1006/jeth.1996.2240
• Border, Kim C. and Segal, Uzi (1997) Preferences Over Solutions to the Bargaining Problem; Econometrica; Vol. 65; No. 1; 1-18; 10.2307/2171811
• Aliprantis, Charalambos D.; Border, Kim C.; et el. (1996) Market economies with many commodities; Rivista di Matematica per le Scienze Economiche e Sociali; Vol. 19; No. 1-2; 113-185; 10.1007/bf02441265
• Border, Kim C. and Segal, Uzi (1994) Dynamic Consistency Implies Approximately Expected Utility Preferences; Journal of Economic Theory; Vol. 63; No. 2; 170-188; 10.1006/jeth.1994.1038
• Aliprantis, Charalambos D. and Border, Kim C. (1994) Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide; ISBN 978-3-662-03006-6; 10.1007/978-3-662-03004-2
• Border, K. C. (1991) Functional analytic tools for expected utility theory; ISBN 9783642635021; 69-88; 10.1007/978-3-642-58199-1_4
• Aliprantis, Charalambos D.; Border, Kim C.; et el. (1991) Positive Operators, Riesz Spaces, and Economics; ISBN 978-3-642-63502-1; 10.1007/978-3-642-58199-1
• Aliprantis, Charalambos D.; Border, Kim C.; et el. (1991) Positive Operators, Riesz Spaces, and Economics; ISBN 978-3-642-63502-1; 10.1007/978-3-642-58199-1
• Border, K. C. (1985) More on Harsanyi’s utilitarian cardinal welfare theorem; Social Choice and Welfare; Vol. 1; No. 4; 279-281; 10.1007/BF00649263
• Border, Kim C. (1984) A Core Existence Theorem for Games Without Ordered Preferences; Econometrica; Vol. 52; No. 6; 1537-1542
• Border, Kim C. (1984) An impossibility theorem for spatial models; Public Choice; Vol. 43; No. 3; 293-305; 10.1007/BF00118938
• Border, Kim C. (1984) An impossibility theorem for spatial models; Public Choice; Vol. 43; No. 3; 293-305; 10.1007/BF00118938
• Border, Kim C. (1983) Social welfare functions for economic environments with and without the pareto principle; Journal of Economic Theory; Vol. 29; No. 2; 205-216; 10.1016/0022-0531(83)90045-5
• Border, Kim C. and Jordan, J. S. (1983) Straightforward Elections, Unanimity and Phantom Voters; Review of Economic Studies; Vol. 50; No. 1; 153-170; 10.2307/2296962